Hi, If that's an acceptable option for you, you can use the Trunk version of FOP in which that bug has been fixed. You can download a snapshot of the source code here: http://svn-master.apache.org/snapshots/fop/ And see here for help about building FOP: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/compiling.html
HTH, Vincent Johannes Katelaan wrote: > So it's a bug in FOP. Too bad! > I will have a closer look at the workarounds described in the blog entry and > see if it helps in the docbook context. > > Thanks! > > Johannes > > Am 17.11.2009 um 12:23 schrieb Damon Mannion: > >> I *think* this is a known limitation to footnotes and FOP? >> >> I *think* this is explained here: >> http://rvdb.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/rendering-footnotes-in-tables-and-lists-with-fop/ >> >> but am in China at the moment, and access to wordpress seems to be >> blocked... >> >> Damon >> >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:01 +0100, "Johannes Katelaan" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> if I put a footnote into a list (I tried itemizedlist and variablelist), >>> then the footnote number will be calculated correctly and will appear in >>> the text, but the footnote body does not appear at the bottom of the >>> page. Is this a bug or a feature? Is there a workaround for this? >>> >>> Johannes >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
