On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:25:57 +0200, Bob Stayton <[email protected]> wrote:
First, I would recommend that you not use 1.75.1, but switch to 1.75.2.
Sorry, my bad - I was actually using 1.75.2 but due to having all kinds
of versions laying around I thought I was using 1.75.1. Sorry for the
misinformation.
When I test dbfo-need with fop.0.95 and 1.75.2, I found that it does
work in some locations but not others. In the case of placing a
dbfo-need between block elements like para, it works. But if you put
the dbfo-need before a section element, it does not.
Regarding the extra space that you noticed, that is the other problem
that fop 0.95 has. It does not yet handle the combination of properties
(primarily space-after.precedence) that puts the text back where it
should start when a dbfo-need is used. That is a limitation that must
await full support for the space-after property in FOP.
Do you know of any specific issues in the fop bug tracker regarding
these issues? I'd like to add myself as a CC so I can track the progress.
So the question is, should we enable a feature for fop 0.95 that
sometimes works but sometimes not, and that adds space where it
shouldn't. I would vote to add support only when FOP handles the
feature properly. But others may see it differently.
I agree with you. I just wanted to know where the failures are.
::Antti::
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
