On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:32, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:43, Stefan Kost <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Am 26.06.2010 15:24, schrieb Tom Browder:
>> ...
>>> You mean like :)
>>> aspell check --mode=sgml doc.xml
>
> I get it, I could have used aspell instead of hunspell and specifying
> the English system dictionary,
>
> Hunspell was the first thing I saw when running apropos on my machine
> to look for a spelling program--didn't think to look further. I
> forgot about aspell--been a loooong time since I used an external
> spell checker
>
> At any rate, aspell should work with my wrapper with suitable command
> line changes. It will still help eliminate the cruft and simplify
> spell checking a large set of files.
Here is my two cents:
xmllint --postvalid --xinclude --nonet ${input_file} | aspell
list -p path/to/aspell.en.pws --mode=sgml --lang=en --encoding=utf-8
Because this trigger quite a lot of false positive I also append:
foreach( skip in `acronym application author code
hardware filename markup programlisting
productname screen sgmltag`)
"--add-f-sgml-skip=${skip}"
endforeach()
HTH
--
Mathieu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
