Indeed, your analysis appears to be correct that HTML tables do not handle footnotes
as table footnotes. They should still appear, but just as ordinary footnotes. I
would classify this as a bug that needs fixing. Can you file a bug report on the
DocBook SourceForge site? Thanks.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Giuseppe Bonelli" <[email protected]>
To: "apps docbook" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:27 AM
Subject: [docbook-apps] footnotes in tables (docbook 4.5 and 1.75.2 stylesheets)
Hi again,
in the stock docbook xslt (1.75.2) I see under xhtml/footnote.xsl (and
in xhtml-1_1/footnote.xsl as well) that the test to discriminate body
text footnotes and table footnotes is done on ancestor::tgroup nodes,
which imply support only for CALS tables.
Does exists a patch or does this simply means that html table model is
not fully supported (I am usinc docbook 4.5) and is better to stick to
CALS?
Thanks,
__peppo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
