I just gave this a shot and it did not appear to work in FOP 1.0. I also see that they haven't added XSL-FO 1.1 indexing extensions, yet.
Is there any reason that this PI has to work using the block-container trick? If you made a processing instruction that created a regular block that had both a keep-with-next.within-column="always" and keep-with-previous.within-column="always"? -Sam On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:14 PM, deannelson <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > Does anyone know if the docbook stylesheets method for "dbfo-need height" is > now supported in the new FOP 1.0 release? > > I know it was broke in the 0.93 & .0.95 releases. > > Regards, > Dean Nelson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
