"Jochen Hayek" <[email protected]> said: >>>>>> Sina K Heshmati writes: >> "Jochen Hayek" said:
<snipped/> >>> So is that a general and well-know critical view at the HTML generated from >>> DocBook Website? > >> Indeed, Jochen. >> Generating clean HTML markup is one of the main objectives >> of our re-implementation of DocBook Website [1]. > > Aha, this is SinDoc's work, I am getting an idea. > > John New also pointed me to his variation of "example.css" at BeagleBytes.com, > which I quite like. > > Well, a couple of questions are actually these: > > (1) What timescale do you have for your re-implementation? It's hard to tell. We'll hopefully have a working version by November but it might take months until we could release something that people could use for production. > (2) Does is make sense, to let a designer improve the CSS for my purpose? It depends on what you mean by improving CSS. If you want to generate a table-less HTML layout, given your DocBook Website source files and website layout, you might want to take a look at SilkPage [2]. > (2) Will Website2 invalidate the CSS used for "Website-2.6", because it > changes > structure and/or naming (conventions)? Yes, indeed! > Actually, Website-3.x was already used for an intermediate version / release, > so I guess, yours should be at least Website-4 to not confuse your the Website > followers. > What do you think? I hope the person(s) who has/have been in charge of the latest releases will come to rescue. I'm a bit confused myself. I reckon we'll use different versioning schemes for schemas and the styelesheets but it hasn't really been discussed yet. Kind regards, SinDoc >> [1] http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/Website2 [2] http://silkpage.markupware.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
