On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Dave Pawson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Anyway those elements doesn't bring any new user experience. > But they do bring better semantics?
I think the rejection of a DocBook-XSL patch adding a distinct HTML5 output (perhaps in the http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#the-xhtml-syntax) would be *extremely* unlikely. That said, at this time I'm not aware of anyone developing that patch. > How long will [IE6] remain the oldest target? This is a question of even greater weight today, as there is renewed interest in cleaning up the HTML (and XHTML, XHTML 1.1, EPUB...) outputs to be more aligned with modern web browsers and web development techniques. Part of what makes the current HTML stylesheets rather baroque is the extensive support for aging browsers. Keith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
