On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:59:07 +0100 Nathalie Sequeira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Dave, > > thank you for the reassuring feedback :) > > Since docbook has no 'proper' expansion of an acronym, I've used the > > universal phrase with a condition? > > > After pondering this a bit, I do understand why you'd qualify the > phrase with an attribute: > it's not just any old phrase, but a phrase that serves a specific > function, i.e. to expand the acronym/abbreviation. > > However, I do not understand why mark it with a "condition"? It would > seem more logical to me to attribute it a "role", no? Yes, it could be role. I chose condition since that seemed right to me. YMMV but you do need it for the customization layer, To process these as you want them, hopefully until the Docbook committee agree it is a worthwhile addition. -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
