Dick Hamilton wrote:

> So, the question is, should the extension treat a final newline this
> way?
> 
> I'm inclined to think that it should not do this. It's not a big deal if
> your content is inline, but with xi:include, it means you need to
> manipulate your file to remove the newline character, which I suspect
> can cause problems if you're trying to use that content elsewhere (for
> example, to test a function).

It's definitively bug and I think I have tried in past to find cause of
problem -- but without success. But might be I'm just confusing this
with somehow related bug in extensions:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3011108&group_id=21935&atid=373747

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: [email protected]      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to