On 19 Mar 2011, at 01:44, Bob Stayton wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> I'm not able to duplicate this problem. In general, the DocBook stylesheets
> use the term "component" to refer to a child of book, and "division" for set,
> book or part. So if your glossary element is a child of book, then
> "component.title" would be correct. I'm surprised that "component.title"
> caused the book title to display, because the call to it selects the glossary
> element.
Thanks for taking a look at this, Bob.
> Perhaps you could describe the structure of your book and the location of the
> glossary?
Sure. We're using XXE and Docbook 5.0, and the resulting document looks like:
<book>
<info>
<title>Book Title</title>
<biblioid>...</biblioid>
<author><orgname>...</orgname></author>
<mediaobject>...</mediaobject> (logo for cover)
</info>
<preface>...</preface>
<chapter>...</chapter> (10 chapters)
<appendix>...</appendix> (8 appendixes)
<glossary>
<title>Glossary</title>
<glossdiv> (lots of glossdivs)
<title>A</title>
<glossentry>...</glossentry> (lots of glossentrys)
</glossdiv>
</glossary>
</book>
> And excuse me if you have already tried this, but does the book validate?
> And do you get this result with the stock DocBook XSL stylesheets or a
> customization layer? If a customization, have you tried the stock
> stylesheets?
Yes, the book validates.
I am using a customization layer. I could very well have messed something up
there, as I do have customized chapter/appendix titling and possibly took a
shortcut there which missed glossary. I shall look at that template closely (I
should have thought of that first - apologies), but trying with the stock
stylesheets is another good idea.
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
