Sorry. I mean that IEEE has a particular visual appearance. It doesn't
look unusual, and I believe the stock XSL:FO are up to the task.
I'm just very surprised to not see someone publishing a drop-in settings
file that cranks out IEEE layout. Figured I should check if there's a
reason. Hate to go barking down the wrong path.
Dave Pawson wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 10:27:07 -0700
David Priest<[email protected]> wrote:
A bit of googling turns up a dearth of information about rendering
IEEE-compliant technical publications. This quite surprises me.
Are the XSL:FO standard transformations easily IEEE-compliant?
For what definition of IEEE compliant David? That sounds really odd
to me, that a transform should be compliant to ... something?
Looking at one of their PDFs there does not seem to be anything
particularly special or tricksy with their layout.
Or do you mean the PDF needs to be 'special' in some way?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
