Bob,

Thanks very much for your help. That seems to fix the problem - I've raised
a bug on sourceforge as requested (
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3314663&group_id=21935&atid=373747
).

I've noticed though with your fix that if 'continuation=continues' is used
on a nested ordered list, and there is not another ordered list at the same
level as the current one, but there is a nested list at the same level in a
previous ordered list, then the numbering from that is picked up. This, to
my mind, is not really desired behaviour - what do you think? (I hope that
makes sense, if not I'll send through an example!)

Howard

On 9 June 2011 16:55, Bob Stayton <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Howard,
> I think that is a bug, since the results are simply wrong.  The numbering
> should continue from the same list nesting level, in my opinion.  Could you
> please file a bug report on the DocBook SourceForge site for this?
>
> To fix it, take a look at the template named
> 'output-orderedlist-starting-number' in common/common.xsl.  In there you
> will see in the "otherwise" case that:
>
> <xsl:variable name="prevlist" select="$list/preceding::orderedlist[1]"/>
>
> This selects the previous list regardless of level, which in your instance
> is the nested list.  I think this selection should be of the preceding list
> with the same number of orderedlist ancestors, something like this
> [untested]:
>
> <xsl:variable name="prevlist"
> select="$list/preceding::orderedlist[count($list/ancestor::orderedlist) =
> count(ancestor::orderedlist)][1]"/>
>
> If DocBook 5, don't forget to add the namespace prefix.
>
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Howard Perrin <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:50 AM
> *Subject:* [docbook-apps] OrderedList and 'continuation' attribute
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem with the 'continuation' attribute on <orderedlist>
> elements. When I set it to 'continues' and the list follows a nested list,
> the numbering is started from the nested list rather than the outer list.
> For example, if I have:
>
> <orderedlist>
>   <listitem><para>First Item</para></listitem>
>   <listitem><para>Second Item</para></listitem>
>   <listitem><para>Third Item</para>
>                  <orderedlist>
>                    <listitem><para>Nested First Item</para></listitem>
>                    <listitem><para>Nested Second Item</para></listitem>
>                    <listitem><para>Nested Third Item</para>
>                    <listitem><para>Nested Fourth Item</para>
>                    <listitem><para>Nested Fifth Item</para>
>                  </orderedlist>
>   </listitem>
> </orderedlist>
>  <orderedlist continuation='continues'>
>   <listitem><para>Fourth Item</para></listitem>
>   <listitem><para>Fifth Item</para></listitem>
>  </orderedlist>
>
> When transformed using the docbook XSL via FO to PDF the output looks like:
>
> 1. First Item
> 2. Second Item
> 3. Third Item
>     a. Nested First Item
>     b. Nested Second Item
>     c. Nested Third Item
>     d. Nested Fourth Item
>     e. Nested Fifth Item
> 6. Fourth Item
> 7. Fifth Item
>
> Maybe this is intended behaviour - but I want to have 6 & 7 actually
> numbered 4 & 5 so that they continue the numbering from the list at the same
> level. Does anyone know if/how I can add something to my customisation layer
> to change the behaviour here?
>
> Thanks!
> Howard
>
>

Reply via email to