Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> writes: > Well, I assume this has something to do that Saxon9 doesn't support the > exsl:document or saxon:output extensions anymore. Unfortunately, this makes > the combination XProc + Calabash + Saxon9 + DocBook XSLT1.0 unusable. It > seems, it doesn't help to add the Saxon6 jar into the classpath.
No, it doesn't. I think the only way to fix this would be to write an
XProc extension step that used the Saxon6 implementation. Or start using
the DocBook XSLT 2.0 stylesheets. :-)
> Can anybody confirm this behaviour? Is there any method to delegate an XSLT
> step for version 1.0 to Saxon 6? Has anybody successfully used Calabash with
> the DocBook XSLT 1.0 stylesheets?
I'll take a quick peek at writing an cx:xslt1 extension step.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | What is familiar is what we are
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | used to; and what we are used to
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | is most difficult to 'Know'--that
| is, to see as a problem; that is,
| to see as strange, as distant, as
| 'outside us'.-- Nietzsche
pgpvQvVYefuDJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
