Hi devs/Hi Dean,

I hope to participate for the *GSoC-2012 *and I like to contribute for the
DocBook with the GSoC project idea[1] of "*Transform from make-based build
system to ANT".*
The project idea was very interesting because 'Ant' made it trivial to
integrate testing with the build process, Ant has made it easy for willing
developers to adopt test-driven development[2].

In idea list,it gave basic introduction about the project mentioned above
as
"Improve the DocBook XSLs build process. ANT is currently a popular build
alternatives which provides the ability to write a clean build script that
is easier to maintain, and for better readability".
But the detail that provided in the idea list is not enough me to
understand the milestones of the idea. So, can you give some detail or some
useful materials to understand the those ?.

According to the professional knowledge that expected,I have considerable
practise with Java. But I don't have much experiences using Ant and Make.
So, now I following those technologies in step by step. Can specify the
expected abilities about those technologies and how is it possible to
transform from "make" to "Ant"?.
If you can provided some resources to gain the abilities up to project idea
level that will be more useful to me.

Thank you in Advance!.

[1]. http://docbook.xmlpress.net/tiki-index.php?page=Ideas2012
[2]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Ant

Regards,
--Gihan Chanuka
--Level 3
--Department of Computer Science and Engineering
--University of Moratuwa
--Sri Lanka


On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:57 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> Gihan
>
> Why are your "building" with the development tree? Are you trying to get a
> DocBook system up and working? You mentioned not needing XSLs. Are you
> using something else to transform the DocBook? Most of the standard DocBook
> stylesheets are written in XSL/XSLT.
>
> What version of DocBook are your using (4.5, 5.0)?
>
> I guess we need to know where you are heading with this project to be able
> to help you.
>
> Regards,
> Dean Nelson
>

Reply via email to