Hi Jirka & Gabor, On 11 October 2012 13:37, Jirka Kosek <[email protected]> wrote: > For large documents Saxon usually outperforms xsltproc, for smaller ones > xsltproc is faster as it doesn't require start of JVM. Xalan is quite > slow and buggy compared to those two.
Right, i forgot to mention that I need a Java processor. Changing to Saxon would indeed speed up things 2-3 times. I was hoping to find some other things that wouldn't require me to change XSLT processors. > l10n code was refactored ~2 years ago to be much faster in typical > scenarios (no customizations). So please make sure that you are using I'm on 1.76.1, which seems to be roughly 2 years ago. I'll see if upgrading to a recent release helps. thanks! Remko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
