Hi Robert,
Thanks for your reply. That certainly works as you suggest:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; version="5.0"
xml:id="mcw-data-storage-guide"><title>Article
Title</title><section><section version="5.0"><info>
        <title xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
        xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
        xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
        xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";
        xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
        xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";>Thing1</title>

However, I'm not clear on why it should be necessary to do it that way.
The DocBook guide provides examples where the <title> element is inside
a <book><info> hierarchy. Plus, it's inconsistent with other title
elements (e.g. the module-level title in my original example).

Thanks,

Graeme

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013, at 12:34, Robert Fekete wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> have you tried putting the title outside the <info> tag?
> Like:
> <structure xml:id="guide">
>               <output renderas="article"/>
>               <title>My Article Title</title>
>               <module renderas="section">
> 
> I use it that way with the same toolchain and it works for me.
> 
> Robert
> 
> On 06/07/2013 10:41 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I'm using version 1.78.1 of the DocBook stylesheets to generate articles
> > from DocBook assembly. Which is nice! But here's my problem: top-level
> > element titles are missing from the output.
> >
> > Given this structure, the output is lacking its top-level element title
> > (in this case, the article title):
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > <assembly xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
> > xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";>
> >     <resources xml:base="topics/reference">
> >             ...
> >      </resources>
> >     <structure xml:id="guide">
> >             <output renderas="article"/>
> >             <info>
> >                     <title>My Article Title</title>
> >             </info>
> >             <module renderas="section">
> >                     <info>
> >                             <title>My Section</title>
> >                     </info>
> >                     <module resourceref="guide-articles"/>
> >                     <module resourceref="guide--lists"/>
> >             </module>
> >             <module resourceref="guide-thing1"/>
> >             <module resourceref="guide-thing2"/>
> >             <module resourceref="guide-thing3"/>
> >     </structure>
> > </assembly>
> >
> > Here's the snipped output of assemble.xsl:
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > <article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; version="5.0"
> > xml:id="guide">
> >     <section>
> >             <section version="5.0">
> >                     <info>
> >                             <title
> >                             xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
> >                             xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
> >                             xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
> >                             xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";
> >                             xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> >                             xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";>Thing
> >                             1</title>
> >                     </info>
> >                     <para>The text of thing1</para>
> >
> >
> > I don't quite understand how it could miss out this detail.
> >
> > I'm using xsltproc to run the stylesheet transformation.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Graeme
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to