davep <[email protected]> writes: > No problem with line numbers. I guess it's the outcome we want > rather than how it is done? > Would that work with insertions too? E.g. lines with (6) etc > which are referred to in commentary?
Yes, that should still work.
>> As long as I'm airing dirty laundry, I'm also tempted to abandon the
>> XSL stylesheets and work instead on a purpose-built HTML+CSS rendering
>> for printing.
>
> I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS...
> My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this.
> Do you believe you can do it?
> What of re-ordering, toc etc?
Oh, you'd need a "for print" HTML stylesheet. There's lots of things
that CSS can't do. But I still think that would be easier for most
people than dealing with XSL FO.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | As the old hermit of Prague, that
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | never saw pen and ink, very
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | wittily said to the niece of King
| Gorboduc, 'That that is, is'.--
| Shakespeare
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
