I think you mentioned exploring HTML+CSS for print a few days ago. Is that because FO might be at the end of it's road?
Thanks! Peter On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Norman Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > "Jan Tosovsky" <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: >>> >>> ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned. >> >> Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any >> citation for this? > > http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/ > > "This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer active, because of > insufficient participation. The specifications are no longer > maintained." > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | Mankind are always happy for > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | having been happy; so that if you > Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | make them happy now, you make them > | happy twenty years hence by the > | memory of it.--Sydney Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
