Hi Mark, I'd edit the fo and run it through your fo processor to confirm that scale-down-to-fit gives the result you want.
For production you'll want to customize the templates from graphics.xsl to make the right stuff come out in the fo. In particular the templates <xsl:template name="image.content.width"> and <xsl:template name="image.content.height"> are important. Really this should be a feature of the stock xslts though. Regards, David On 01/05/2014 03:58 AM, Mark Craig wrote: > Thanks Bob and David, > > What's the right way to pass the "scale-down-to-fit" attribute value > into the FO? > > I've tried adding them as attributes on <imagedata> with some XSL that I > was using before to handle wide images. Here's the template where > xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; exclude-result-prefixes="db": > > <xsl:template match="db:imagedata"> > <xsl:element name="imagedata" namespace="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";> > <xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/> > <xsl:attribute name="contentdepth">scale-down-to-fit</xsl:attribute> > <xsl:attribute name="contentwidth">scale-down-to-fit</xsl:attribute> > <xsl:attribute name="align">center</xsl:attribute> > </xsl:element> > </xsl:template> > > After this transformation and running the stylesheets, > text-align="center" shows up in the resulting .fo, but the others are > null: content-width="" content-height="". > > Is there a stylesheet customization I should apply to allow those > attribute values to pass through to the FO? > > Or do I need to edit the FO after it gets generated? > > Regards, > Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
