Thanks, Róbert.
I get the feeling that I should have joined this list a long time ago and not 
just now...

f.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fekete, Róbert [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Dienstag, 9. September 2014 11:42
To: Wegmann, Frank
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

Hi Frank,

using the webhelp-fast stylesheets from this thread reduces the build time 
immensely:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/201310/msg00003.html

(It does not solve the problem of including the ToC in every file, though.)

Rober

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Wegmann, Frank <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> That is most interesting, especially now that I tested a worst-case scenario 
> using a single <set> document being 42.6 MB large. This took full 12 hours to 
> generate all HTML pages (yes, I used a larger JVM heap space). Now this is 
> still something that could somehow be handled, not without pain, of course, 
> but it's a question of job scheduling. However, the resulting HTML files all 
> contain the complete TOC of the set so each of the 4,450 HTML files is around 
> 200 kB, totaling 8.7 GB.
> Perhaps I'm missing some runtime setting here, but of course the TOC should 
> be present just once. Is that possible?
> BTW, I also created a PDF file from the set: Processing time was adequate, 
> but decent, and the 9,738 pages came out just fine.
>
> Now, Mary, if you managed to develop a solution that operates on book level 
> but creates a WebHelp for a complete set, then it would be beneficial 
> probably not only for me, if you could tell us about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Tabasko [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Samstag, 6. September 2014 01:42
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!
>
> Frank Wegmann said:
>
>> our documentation sets often consist of many "modules"
>> resulting in as many DocBook files (and as many PDF files), but to 
>> produce a single WebHelp for all of them it seems the only way is to 
>> wrap all DocBook files into a single <set>. Is that correct?
>> Because I feel this is not really an option, since some sets comprise 
>> several thousand pages and we might run into serious performance 
>> trouble.
>
> That's exactly what we did. We have several "book"-level documents, from 
> which we generate individual PDFs, and for the Webhelp (and for the MSHelp 
> before it), we simply had a "set"-level document that included the 
> "book"-level documents. For the product for which we did this, there were 
> three PDFs, with page counts of (rounding up) 700, 800, and 40 (just 40) 
> pages. These were wrapped into one "set" for one of our Webhelp "documents". 
> I was able to keep the processing of this helpset (HTML and indexing) to 
> about 2 minutes, though we are NOT profiling.
>
> Just for grins, I may try running one of our "monster" docs (we have a couple 
> that are over 2000 pages as PDF) through it, but we have no plans to provide 
> those as HTML, so I haven't bothered yet.
>
>> (And, Mary, yes, I'm quite obviously interested in your WebHelp 
>> experiences as well...)
>
> I'm amazed at the level of interest!
>
> I will put together my notes -- is it OK to send a PNG (screenshot) to this 
> list, so you can see what it looks like??
>
>
> -- Mary Tabasko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [email protected]
>
>
> Software AG – Sitz/Registered office: Uhlandstraße 12, 64297 
> Darmstadt, Germany – Registergericht/Commercial register: Darmstadt HRB 1562 
> - Vorstand/Management Board: Karl-Heinz Streibich (Vorsitzender/Chairman), 
> Dr. Wolfram Jost, Arnd Zinnhardt; - Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender/Chairman of the 
> Supervisory Board: Dr. Andreas Bereczky - http://www.softwareag.com
>

Reply via email to