Hi there,
I started on writing a specification document that maps the DocBook elements to 
the necessary PDF structure elements.
Well, I started with FOP (based of PDF v1.5) as basis, but I think that the 
other processors act the same way. It would be great if someone familiar with 
XEP, Antenna, DocMill, etc. could have a look at the document and give some 
feedback. The document can be found over here: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DrADbdNjFEeXBv5n7LNIBrKsI1Kl-oqY5jkN-U8K5p8/edit?usp=sharing

The document is not yet finished but it is a good starting point for 
implementing tagged structure elements in the DocBook -> FO transformation 
process.
So, if someone likes to add some content, please contact me (via this mail 
address) for edit-privileges.

During my time writing this document I came across several 'anomalies' of the 
DocBook XSL transformation that I also would like to discuss with you:

The list types 'simplelist' and 'segmentedlist' don't generate 
fo:list-block-code content. simplelist uses a table or inline element for 
rendering. I think this will not be that easy to tag in PDF. Maybe the 
implementation could be changed? In the case of segmentedlist there is fo:block 
code generated. Maybe the reuse of quandaset code could help in that case.

Any feedback is welcome!

Thanks to Tony and Katharina providing me further information!

Thx + Bye,
Holger



> Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. April 2017 um 09:18 Uhr
> Von: "Bob Stayton" <[email protected]>
> An: "Dave Pawson" <[email protected]>, "Holger Bast" <[email protected]>
> Cc: docbook-apps <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: [docbook-apps] tagged and accessible PDF document with DocBook
>
> On 4/3/2017 11:31 PM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > No, xsl-fo has no document wide 'structure'. If any, that should come
> > from your source XML and
> > be carried over to the fo, then PDF.
> 
> Exactly.  Now, what I need is a mapping from DocBook elements to fo, for 
> the three FO processors.  Then I can implement it in the XSL.  If 
> someone were to generate that spec, it would speed up the process greatly.
> 
> 
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> [email protected]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to