Thnx for the reply. I feared that might be the case. I'll harass the
package manager on mu Linux dist ;)
/Niels
On 05/29/18 15:55, stefan wrote:
On 2018-05-29 08:27 AM, Niels Müller Larsen wrote:
Hi there
Back in 2015 I had issues with missing bibliography entries. Bob
Stayton directed me towards using namespaced stylesheets, and that
solved the problem.
Now, 2018, I think I read somewhere that the xsl-stylesheets-1.79.2
stylesheets were namespaced even though the -ns- from the name
disappeared.
Quite a while ago I migrated the docbook-xsl repo from sourceforge to
github (https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets). Given that we
had to change URLs anyhow, we took the opportunity to cleanup some
other bits of logic, such as the relationship between namespace-aware
vs. non-namespace-aware stylesheets.
So any packages build from the new repo are namespace-aware by
default, while the non-namespace-aware packages are generated and use
the "nons" suffix in their name (see
https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/releases).
Unfortunately I don't think any official docbook-xsl release was ever
built from the new repo, so I fear that all packages you can get from
Linux distributions will all still be built from the old (and very
outdated) sourceforge code.
Some experiments with xsl-stylesheets-1.79.2-4 on my arch linux bring
back the missing biblipgraphy items. I am confused, can anyone
explain, please?
/Niels
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
