Thanks Bob.

I'll try and do as Niels said and pull the stylesheets from 79.1

regards

On 30 June 2018 at 21:52, Bob Stayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> You can still get docbook-xsl-ns-1.79.1 (the namespaced version for DocBook
> 5) from the SourceForge site:
>
>   https://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/files/docbook-xsl-ns/1.79.1/
>
> The stylesheets have never included the schema files, which are available
> from docbook.org:
>
>   https://docbook.org/xml/5.1/
>
> Sorry for the disarray on the GitHub site.  Stefan Seefeld did a great job
> transitioning from SourceForge, but I need to make more content
> improvements.  I'm finally getting back to DocBook work, so you can expect a
> new XSL release and better doc, coming soon.
>
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> [email protected]
>
> On 6/30/2018 10:31 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> Sorry, docbook 5 I believe.
>
> 1.79.1 from
> https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/releases/tag/release%2F1.79.1
>
> Assume complete with schema etc.
>
> Thanks Bob
>
> regards
>
> On 30 June 2018 at 17:34, Bob Stayton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Download the 1.79.1 zip file.  Are you using DocBook 4 or 5?
>
> https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/releases/tag/release%2F1.79.1
>
> There is a 1.79.2 release, but it is functionally the same as 1.79.1 but was
> built differently and a few issues came up with it, so I would use 1.79.1.
>
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> [email protected]
>
> On 6/30/2018 6:59 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> Some oddities with my current (quite old) stylesheets.
> What is the preferred install method please?
>
> git clone / download zip?
>
> Is build needed?
>
> Of note:
> xslt10-stylesheets-master/....  seems to differ
> from older installs?
>
> Is any of this documented please?
>
>
> TiA
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to