I.e. Semantically marked up docbook is clearly the wrong tool then. Dave On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 14:20, Peter Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the table is adding valid semantic structure here. It allows the > figure numbering to exist at the Docbook level, not in SVG. > > Maybe use <figure> elements inside an <informaltable>? You could wrap the > informaltable in an example to give the entire set of diagrams a title. > > Peter > > <informaltable> > <tgroup cols="2"> > <tbody> > <row> > <entry><figure> > <title>Chemical One</title> > <mediaobject> > <imageobject> > <imagedata fileref="1.svg"/> > </imageobject> > </mediaobject> > </figure></entry> > > <entry><figure> > <title>Chemical Two</title> > <mediaobject> > <imageobject> > <imagedata fileref="2.svg"/> > </imageobject> > </mediaobject> > </figure></entry> > </row> > </tbody> > </tgroup> > </informaltable> > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 08:28 Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018, 14:12:15 CEST schrieb Bernhard Kleine: >> > In my second mail to this threat a showed a complex table with >> > structures, arrows labeling etc. I cannot envisage this without a table >> > structure. >> >> As Dave already pointed out, a table might not be the appropriate way to >> layout things. >> >> Have you considered SVG? With SVG (or any other vector format) you can do all >> the fancy stuff (arrows, labeling etc.) that you need. >> >> >> -- >> Gruß/Regards >> Thomas Schraitle >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
