https://web.hypothes.is/
AFAIK - meant to 'comment' on html (and could be used that way.) Unsure if you want to mark up / comment on XML or some more 'user friendly' version of same? Just a suggestion. Dave On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 17:53, Peter Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! Does anyone have a document content review process you can > recommend? One that allows non-DocBook users to easily provide input > and see each other's comments? > > My team uses Google docs for content review because reviewers can > comment easily and see each other's input (this is at a company that > uses Google email/docs). It's error-prone and tedious to transform > DocBook content to Google documents though. I would love to find a > better solution. > > We keep content in GitHub and I love the pull request content review > tools there. Most of our subject matter experts do not use GitHub > though, and it's not practical to review all DocBook content by > reading the source XML. > > The conversion to Google doc format that works the best for us (so > far) is DocBook > HTML > LibreOffice OpenDocument > Upload to Google > drive and convert to Google doc format. We lose important formatting > like bold for guilabel elements and bullet characters for > itemizedlists disappear. Preparing a document for review is painful. > > Do you have a great DocBook-based review process? > > Thanks! > > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
