> From: Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> In
>
>
>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=456174&group_id=21935&atid=384107
>
> Yann Dirson suggests that a yearrange element be added to copyright.
>
> The TC considered this and admitted to a certain amount of fudging in
> practice, using <year>1999-2001</year>. This is less than ideal, but
> what have other people elected to do when faced with this problem?
>
> Another obvious possibility is to let the stylesheet take care of
> the collation.
Is further structure really necessary here?
Would a yearrange look something like this:
<yearrange><yearstart>1999</yearstart><yearend>2001</yearend></yearrange>
Seems like overkill, IMHO.
I like the simplicity of permitting <year>1999-2001</year>.
Its meaning is quite clear, in all languages.
I'm sure there are XML applications that may be expecting a
4-digit year, but perhaps the burden should be on those
applications to parse a range into individual years.
bobs
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
Caldera International, Inc. fax: (831) 429-1887
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
