On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:42:30PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> | 456469 Entities for more attributes
>
> Rejected. The existing mechanisms are sufficient.
Well, they do not help much in this respect, when it comes to
upgrading a new version of DocBook. But well, that's not the only
limitation in the provided customisation model - most of them coming
from syntactic constrainsts.
I've started to work on the specs of a DTD customisation engine, that
would allow to say "remove this element/attribute" and such, and check
constraints like "it must be a pure subset" in rewritten rules. I'll
open a project on freesoftware.fsf.org to have a place to discuss the
scope and implementation of the thing.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software Engineer Ing�nieur Logiciel-Libre
Free-Software time manager Responsable du temps Informatique-Libre
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
