/ Trevor Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| In TDG the examples for funcdef are of this style:
|
| <funcdef>int <function>sample</function></funcdef>
|
| However, the content model for function allows the returnvalue element.
| This implies that one could markup that same function as:
|
| <funcdef><function><returnvalue>int</returnvalue> sample</function></funcdef>
|
| Now the question is whether that's sensible. (I'd argue that returntype is
| a better name for an element in this context.)
|
| How would others markup such function definitions? Staying with TDG or
| going with the alternative.
Returnvalue is a relatively new addition. I think it makes sense to
markup the return type.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The First Amendment is often
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | inconvenient. But that is besides
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | the point. Inconvenience does not
| absolve the government of its
| obligation to tolerate
| speech.--Justice Anthony Kennedy,
| in 91-155
