On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:47:41PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Rory Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | Something like, mediawidth vs. reproductionwidth (but not to pretentious)?
>
> I take your point. Unfortunately, removing the existing attributes
> would require waiting until DocBook V6.0. And the semantics of the
> existing attributes are reproductionwidth and reproductiondepth.
Maybe I'm just confused, but I'd rather distinguish:
physicalwidth (or mediawidth)
the actual width of the image
viewportwidth
the width of the area in which the image is to be reproduced
reproductionwidth
the effective width of the image
If I understand well, in the current proposal "width" stands for my
"reproductionwidth", "contentwidth" stands for my "physicalwidth", and
we have nothing for my "physicalwidth". Right ?
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software Engineer Ing�nieur Logiciel-Libre
Free-Software time manager Responsable du temps Informatique-Libre
Debian GNU/Linux developper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
