At 9:26 AM -0500 3/22/02, Norman Walsh wrote: >/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: >| OK. That will work, and I can see how to extend it for interfaces too. >| Thanks! I still wonder if this shouldn't be an element of its own >| though. The notion of superclasses is pretty fundamental to object >| oriented languages. It could be written in a non language specific way >| like this: > >Feel free to write a proposal :-)
OK. Is there a sample proposal for an existing element somewhere I could copy the basic structure and format from? -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
