On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 06:58:53AM -0500, Michael Smith wrote: > Yeah, I know if Remark were made a class of Annotation, sub-classes of > remarks could also be handled by just including the sub-class values > as values of a second attribute on Annotation (the Role attribute or > whatever). But it seems to me that, as a rule, if a strong need to > sub-class a certain attribute of an element is foreseen, it's time to > make that attribute an element instead (or, in the case of Remark, to > just continue to retain it as a separate element).
If only we could subclass an element with another element, that would make things much clearer... -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/ Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) D�veloppeur Debian
