-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 17 February 2003 06:41 pm, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alex Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > [...] > > Have you considered simply moving the methodsynopsis out of the > classsynopsis, at least for the purposes of larger description?
I'd considered it, but it seems a bit cumbersome and doesn't "feel right" to me, espically given the presence of a functionsynopsisinfo tag which essentially fills my needs. It seems kind of inconsistent not to include a similar descriptive capability for a callable entry point simply because it has the context of a class and not the top-level namespace.. > You could even make the methodsynopsis a link back to some > classsynopsis overview at the top of the document, with a little > effort. I think for now that's what we'll do, although I still consider the lack of a methodsynopsisinfo tag to be an omission (if only for the sake of consistency). Thanks. - -- Alex Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+UDm+oV0dQ6uSmkYRAh1GAKCf5iFE7CLwiZqWVwh3jhxvyShoewCgt9AO ZllGetGuSNJoboPILaXRma0= =2wwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
