On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:55:15AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> / Alan Cocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | I gather from the element reference in *Docbook: TDG* that to express the
>relationship between, say, an article and the journal in which it is published, one
>should use two BIBLIOSETs inside a single BIBLIOENTRY.
> |
> | However, how should one express the relationship between two distinct BIBLIOENTRYs?
> |
> | I've searched the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive and on the web, but I
>haven't found a clear answer.
> |
> | The kinds of cases I have in mind are:
> |
> | - one biblioentry representing an article published in a journal, and another
>representing the anthology in which it is reprinted
> |
> | - conversely, one biblioentry (eg, a newspaper article) that is an extract from
>another (eg, a book)
> |
> | - one biblioentry (an article) that is a review of another (a book by a different
>author)
> |
> | - two biblioentrys representing different language editions or different revisions
>of the same book
>
> You could simply put the two biblioentrys next to each other. For what
> purpose do you want to establish a link between them?
Or putting it another way, how to traditional bibliographies
indicate such links? I seem to recall Latin like
op cit and such.
--
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
