I think Jirka is right. I currently use <uri> for XML namespaces for the very reasons cited. The namespace is not a tag or a proper part of the markup. I do not think that a provision should be made in <tag> for namespaces. Perhaps it can be added to <uri>'s type attribute...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:52 PM > To: Bob Stayton > Cc: Chris Chiasson; Dave Pawson; Docbook List > Subject: Re: [docbook] namespace markup > > Bob Stayton wrote: > > In DocBook 4.5, the <sgmltag> element has a class attribute with > > enumerated values. One of those enumerated values is 'namespace'. > > For some reason, the equivalent <tag> element in 5.0 is > missing that > > value and a few others. I think it is an oversight, and I > filed an RFE > > to see if it should get fixed. So I think this is how a namespace > > name should be marked up: > > > > <tag class="namespace">http://docbook.org/ns/docbook</tag> > > I still think that > > <uri type="xmlnamespace">http://docbook.org/ns/docbook</uri> > > is much more proper way of marking namespace. Namespace > itself is not "tag", nor other part of markup. > > Jirka > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO/JTC1/SC34 member > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want to speak at XML Prague 2007 => http://xmlprague.cz/cfp.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
