Hey, Does anyone process or markup ulinks differently if they point to invalid (example) URLs? There's currently a push from our Production department to not have ulinks to obviously example sites like <ulink url="example.com/some_complex_path/foo/bar.xml"/> rendered as PDF links. I have my own opinions, but....
Good style for marking up/displaying ulinks that aren't real? Thanks, Keith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
