jmt wrote:

> Nevertheless, I'm a bit disappointed to realize that, for instance :
> 
> <para><inlineequation>MathML stuff</inlineequation></para>
> 
> is NOT valid Docbook5 ; effectively the only elements in Docbook 5 that 
> natively support mathml elements are equation and informalequation.
> 
> I've tried, but for now on, with no success, to modify the docbook rnc to be 
> able to write such things.
> Any pointers on this subject will be welcome !

Moving to docbook list as this is markup issue.

Lack of MathML support inside inlineequation is probably bug. However,
you can easily fix it by creating simple schema customization:

include "docbook.rnc"

db.inlineequation.content |= db._any.mml+

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to