Jirka Kosek wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote:
Further effort to extend, this time a block level element.
<include href="/sgml/docbook/v5/docbook.rng">
<define name="db.para.blocks" combine='choice'>
<oneOrMore> <ref name="poem"/> </oneOrMore>
</define>
</include>
Nesting define inside include works like redefinition.
Which is what (I thought) I was doing Jirka?
Adding (another choice) to the existing definition?
Your schema
should look like:
<include ...docbook.rng/>
<include ...poem.rng/>
<define name="db.para.blocks" combine="choice">
...
</define>
Works perfectly!
Why isn't this a redefinition... in fact what is it
if it isn't a redefinition please?
Or you can simply add this last define directly inside poem.rng.
Even simpler, though I like the idea of a simple 'customization'
file, just as I do with XSLT. Makes for a simple model.
Thanks Jirka.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT, XSL-FO and Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
