Markus Hoenicka wrote:
C-x w r means unhighlight-regexp
<keycombo> seems wrong with the combinations?
<keycombo>C-x</keycombo><userinput>w r</
My gut feeling is that in this case "w r" should not be treated as
userinput, but as keypresses that belong to a command sequence. This is
different from pressing M-x, which gets you into a command prompt in the
minibuffer. So, the former should be like (leaving out the attribute
tinsel):
<keycombo><keycap>Ctrl</keycap><keycap>x</keycap></keycombo><keycap>w</keycap><keycap
>r</keycap>
With the hyphen being in the presentation layer. OK, C-x is a valid
combination.
w r?
"Keypresses that belong to a command sequence".
Thomas also marked it as a command. 'An emacs command'
<keycombo action="seq">
<keycombo action="press">
<keycap function="control">Ctrl</keycap>
<keycap>x</keycap>
</keycombo>
<keycap>w</keycap>
<keycap>r</keycap>
</keycombo>
from Thomas does look right (but very complicated :-)
<keycombo>
<keycap function="meta">M</keycap>
<keycap>x</keycap>
</keycombo>
<command>revert-buffer</command>
Also works with similar logic, except that I'd prefer them to be in a
single wrapper element (hence my query on the content model, not as is,
but should it be extended).
whereas I'd write the latter as:
<keycombo><keycap>Alt</keycap><keycap>x</keycap></keycombo><keycap>revert-buffer</keycap>
Nitpicking, but I'd object to <keycap>revert-buffer</keycap>
since there is no such key?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT, XSL-FO and Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
