Jirka Kosek wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
because I believe this doesn't belong into a footnote but into a more
visible place. (I see a disturbing trend of features that rely on users
using some java toolchain to process their docbook. That's very sad.)
If you for some reason doesn't want to use Java you can of course port
this extension to other language and use extension API of your preferred
XSLT implementation to invoke it from stylesheet. It is open-source.
You are right for some extent. I am a java programmer and I love it, and
I agree that it great. But xml is implementation independent and it
should be processed the same way with any tool. However, this is
debatable subject, and I will install the java tools for this soon. Will
let you know how thing went.
Thank you.
Or you can put aside your religious prejudice and use Java and Saxon,
because you will use the most mature, reliable and extensible XSLT
engine which runs on many platforms (thanks to Java).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
