2008/1/16, Nic Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think it's because a glossary can be used at the same level (in the > document 'hierarchy') as an appendix. If it's inside an appendix the schema > requires something more to be there. If it's the only thing inside your > glossary then perhaps you don't need the appendix element. >
Reading [1] more carefully, this behaviour is part of appendix syntax. But at this point, the discussion could be: 1) if there's a strong opinion that semantically it does have sense to have a glossary inside an appendix, just permit to be the only element of it; 2) otherwise, just forbid it (and probably even forbid bibliography, index and toc to be part of an appendix). I would probably prefer 2) . [1] http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/appendix.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
