Peter Desjardins wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Barton Wright
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another +1 for a non-xinclude conref feature.
No one talks about the hidden cost of xincludes, which is that they are
expensive in terms of the time they take in a large Java-based doc build
process. The more xincludes our doc set accrues, the longer the doc build takes.
This is the biggest problem I have encountered with DocBook. I've
achieved whatever content reuse I've needed so far using xincludes and
xpointer. I posted the permutations that I find useful here:
http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookCookbook
But they only work with xmllint.
Agreed on xpointer, not really surprising though. Xinclude works
fine with Saxon and xerces.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
