I believe you want the float-styles "inside" and "outside" supported for
certain FO processors only.

SJT



2008/8/22 Richard Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> As a related follow up, does anyone know of a way to cause an "outside"
> float?  I.e., a float that would be on the right on a recto page and on
> the left on a verso page?  I suspect it's difficult or impossible to do
> this automatically in the stylesheets, since there seems to be no way to
> know until the fo processing whether any particular text is on a verso
> or recto page, but I'd like to be proven wrong:-).
>
> Dick Hamilton
> http://rlhamilton.net
>
> On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 09:35 -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Stephen,
> > Well, the DocBook schema currently doesn't allow floatstyle on
> > sidebar.  It seems that it should, but it was never added.  So the
> > semantics still require processing instructions, as described here:
> >
> > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SideFloats.html
> >
> > Bob Stayton
> > Sagehill Enterprises
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >         ----- Original Message -----
> >         From: Stephen Taylor
> >         To: [email protected]
> >         Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 8:33 AM
> >         Subject: [docbook] Floats in DocBook 5.0
> >
> >
> >         What are the recommended semantics for floats in V5?
> >
> >         I see email traffic pre-V5 about deprecating the "float"
> >         attribute in favour of "floatstyle". So, for example, where my
> >         customisation layer floats sidebars on the left by default,
> >         using the sidebar.float.type parameter, to float an individual
> >         sidebar on the right, the following?
> >
> >         <sidebar floatstyle="right">
> >           <title>Sidebar example</title>
> >           <para>A sidebar can be used to emphasise…</para>
> >         </sidebar>
> >
> >         If the answer is Yes, I'd be grateful for suggestions as to
> >         why the above sidebar floats on the left with the others.
> >
> >         Best
> >         Stephen Taylor
> >
>
>

Reply via email to