Rowland, Larry wrote:
Most of control of specific output characteristics is done with processing 
instructions in DocBook.  This allows specifics for different outputs to be 
specified (using dbfo and dbhtml type identifiers within the processing 
instructions).   I guess this is part of the philosophy of trying to separate 
the content from the presentation.  You could add your own dbslide PIs.  This 
might help reduce the load on the role attribute.

But this is fundamentally wrong ! I don't want 'processing instructions', I want 'presentational semantics'. The issue is that with docbook-slides we have entered a domain where it is even harder to separate presentation from content than it already is in the traditional domains served by docbook.

Regards,
      Stefan



Best Regards,

Larry Rowland
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Seefeld [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:45 PM
To: W. Martin Borgert
Cc: docbook; DocBook Apps Mailing List
Subject: [docbook] Re: [docbook-apps] slides: how to balance presentation and 
content

W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Did you use my docbookslides2s5.xsl, I posted on 2007-01-05 on
the docbook-apps mailing list? It should be in the archives.

I will have a look, thanks.
I used a stylesheet I wrote about two years ago, and which is now part of the docbook-xsl repository, albeit not (yet) in a package. As time permits I'm going to improve it, if possible (I already patched S5 quite a bit, as its use of 'innerHTML' wasn't compatible with my use of XHTML (required to handle MathML)...

I used role=incremental in lists, but don't think, I had support
for overlayed images.

As I mentioned, I would be interested in improving the DB vocabulary itself to allow support for more powerful features in the output media. It seems the 'role' attribute isn't the right way to move forward...


Regards,
       Stefan



--

     ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to