On 09-Apr-3, at 10:34 AM, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
On Freitag, 3. April 2009, David Priest wrote:
[...]
Is there a reason why do you not use the xml:id attribute? If it's
just for cross-referencing, xml:id is the perfect match.
Because the xinclude does not copy the section element. The xml:id
never makes it into the master document: only its children are
copied.
Hmn, I'm a bit confused. Let's say, you have a file foo.xml which
contains
a section. To include it into your master document you just write:
<xi:include href="foo.xml"/>
Nothing else. :) Everything from foo.xml, including your section, is
incorporated into your master document.
I do not want the section included, nor its title. As I wrote in the
original question, the xincludes usually look something like this:
<xi:include
href="source.xml"
xpointer="xmlns(db=http://docbook.org/ns/docbook)
xmlns(xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude)
xpointer(//db:secti...@xml:id='section_id']/db:title/following-
sibling::*)"
/>
The source files are structured differently from the master document;
the master document combines content from several sections,
interspersed with customer-directed verbiage.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attachment hereto
may contain confidential information of Meyer Sound Laboratories, Incorporated
and is intended for the personal and confidential use of the designated
recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient), you have received this
message in error and any review, distribution, or copying of this message or
any attachment hereto is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please promptly notify the sender and permanently delete it from your
computer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
