Daniel Leidert wrote: > First, thanks for your answer. Unfortunately this license does not fit > the requirements of the Debian project - the Debian Free Software > Guidelines (DFSG) [1]. It wouldn't allow us or a user to modify the > source - not even to fix a typo or to create a translation.
If there is a typo, it should be reported upstream to fix primary document. If someone wants to create translation, he has to ask and he will of course be granted to create translation. But this way we will be aware of translation and we can link to it from original English version. > [2] contains a list of acceptable licenses for the Debian project. I > don't know your discussion, so I cannot make a suggestion (why not an > BSD license or an MIT/X license?). Why do you want to forbid derivatives > works? Well, it is document not a software for which I prefer BSD. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: [email protected] http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
