Dave Pawson <[email protected]> writes: > On 04/09/09 17:28, Dick Hamilton wrote: >> Dave, >> >> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common >> attribute. > >> Since role is user-defined, creating separate names for >> each element lets customizers define the contents of >> role independently for different elements. >> >> So, it's a common attribute by virtue of being common, >> but is defined separate from db.common.attributes so >> that it can be customized. > > So it is a tdg omission then?
Well. At the very least, it's not very clear :-) http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#ch05-classrole Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | Men are more like the times they live http://nwalsh.com/ | in than they are like their | fathers.--Ali Ibn-abi-talib
pgpHBJiN7MzXs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
