I don't know of a validator that will parse that form of comment, butI did
notice that if I download that xhtml DTD from www.w3.org, I get this format:
<!ENTITY % ContentType "CDATA">
<!-- media type, as per [RFC2045] -->
which is different than your example and should parse just fine. Perhaps
you're not using the current version of the DTDs?
On Sep 20, Johan Persson ([email protected]) wrote:
> I'm trying to find a good XML/Docbook validator that can work in a mixed
> environment where I have project where 90% is docbook but also 10% based on
> older XHTML which is validated against DTD's (for example
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"; )
>
> The problem I have is that while the docbooks validate fine as soon as I try
> to
> use any of the W3C DTD's they will fail since they use the syntax (for
> example)
>
> <!ENTITY % ContentType "CDATA"
> -- media type, as per [RFC2045]
> -->
>
> which will fail to parse since the validators think that the ENTITY element
> is
> missing an ending ">" and don't understand the "--" as a comment.
>
> Is there anyone who knows a good validator for both Docbook and older DTD's ?
>
> (I've tried Xerces and Sun's MSV)
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Neil Roeth
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
