The assembly does not require using topics.  Conventional DocBook elements like 
chapter and section can be used as resources.  The introduction of topic was to 
facilitate development of documentation for which the topic-orientation can be 
helpful.  The idea was to support reuse of existing content while extending the 
model for other users.

Regards,
Larry Rowland

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [docbook] RE: Sections and topics


I am proposing that the traditional DocBook schema allow for sections to appear 
at the same level as chapters. That is, we allow a book to contain chapters or 
sections.
This would allow "traditional" DocBook users who want and need to use chapters 
to continue using them, while allowing other users the flexibility to work with 
one less level in the hierarchy.

I'm not suggesting that Modular DocBook be abandoned. I think that Modular 
DocBook has some really useful features and will go a long way to helping 
DocBook users. However, I am a bit confused as to why the assembly requires the 
use of the Topic element (i.e., why couldn't the resources also accept chapters 
and sections?). Will it be possible for users to easily share content between 
Modular DocBook and the non-modular DocBook? Or is the intent that a team will 
either write exclusively in Modular DocBook?

Thank you in advance,
Kate



..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Kate Wringe | Tech Writer 2| Sybase
445 Wes Graham Way, Waterloo, ON, N2L 6R2 Canada | Tel: (519) 883-6838 | 
[email protected] | www.sybase.com






<[email protected]>

07/27/2010 10:32 AM

To

<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

cc

<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

Subject

RE: [docbook] RE: Sections and topics







I have similar misgivings as Kate. I haven't seen the full proposal for modular 
content (is it out there?), but I don't think that a whole new solution needs 
to be designed. I actually like the linear structure of DocBook and the fact 
that we don't need an entirely separate construct in order to sequence content 
the way DITA does. I just think we need to tweak the definitions of the section 
elements so that they are not tied to a particular level in the hierarchy and 
can be reused in multiple contexts *if desired*. But I don't see that bursting 
an integrated flow into tiny pieces in order to reuse one of them is 
necessarily the best solution.



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:50 AM
To: Bob Stayton
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Cavicchio, 
Rob
Subject: Re: [docbook] RE: Sections and topics


Hi Bob

Thank you for responding and providing more information about DocBook 5.1.

When I look at the description of Topic in the Unofficial DocBook 5.1 
Definitive Guide, it appears as though Topic is more akin to chapter than 
section in that you
cannot nest Topics within Topics 
(http://www.docbook.org/tdg51/en/html/topic.html).

If I have a <Topic> that contains multiple <sections> can I convert one or more 
of the sections into <Topics> and vice versa?

Thank you,
Kate

..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Kate Wringe | Tech Writer 2| Sybase
445 Wes Graham Way, Waterloo, ON, N2L 6R2 Canada | Tel: (519) 883-6838 | 
[email protected] | www.sybase.com





Bob Stayton <[email protected]>

07/26/2010 07:21 PM


To

<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, 
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

cc

Subject

Re: [docbook] RE: Sections and topics










This discussion is of great interest to the DocBook Technical Committee, as we 
are
currently developing a DocBook solution for modular content.  I believe most of 
the
problems that have been mentioned here will be addressed.

The first step toward modular content was the introduction of the topic 
element, which
will debut in DocBook 5.1.  A topic element is meant as a standalone module of
content, ready to be assembled into larger documents.  Its structure is similar 
to
section.  The placement of topic within existing DocBook elements like book and
chapter is not very important, as those will serve primarily as storage boxes 
for
topic elements to be assembled.

The other addition in 5.1 will be the assembly element and its descendant 
elements
like structure, resource and module.  An assembly is similar to a DITA map, in 
that it
contains a set of pointers that define the content and structure of the 
assembled
document, but not the content itself.  But a DocBook assembly is quite 
different from
a DITA map in many ways.

One of the features will be an option to include content without including the 
wrapper
element, which permits you to avoid duplicate ID values in an assembled 
document.
Another is the renderas attribute, which allows you to convert a topic to a 
chapter,
appendix, or section as needed, or vice-versa.

You can expect to soon see public announcements regarding release of the new 
schemas
in beta form for testing, as well as some documentation and tools for 
processing.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]


----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: [docbook] RE: Sections and topics


[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] wrote:

>
Here's the problem that I am increasingly running into: We have a <section> in 
one
book that we want to reuse as a <chapter> in another book and vice versa.
<


This does not solve your immediate issue, but I think that the time has really 
come to
allow <section> at any level. The whole chapter vs. section thing is very
static-book-oriented and does not lend itself well to information reuse.


*************************
Rob Cavicchio
Principal Technical Writer & Information Architect
EMC Captiva
Information Intelligence Group
EMC Corporation
3721 Valley Centre Drive, Ste 200
San Diego, CA 92130

P: (858) 320-1208
F: (858) 320-1010
E: [email protected]

The opinions expressed here are my personal opinions. Content published here is 
not
read or approved in advance by EMC and does not necessarily reflect the views 
and
opinions of EMC.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to