"Bob Stayton" <[email protected]> writes: > The part before the "|" has to have something, but the part after does > not. Does that relieve the ambiguity? And this could be expressed in > DTD syntax as well, no?
No, I don't think that quite works, as Jirka pointed out. But with enough work,
maybe one can be constructed. I'll give it some thought.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | No victor believes in chance.--
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | Nietzsche
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
pgps4q7pssdzY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
