On 12/07/2011 10:14 PM, Norman Walsh wrote:
davep<[email protected]> writes:
What about markup for an assembly level instruction?
<instr proc='ARM'>vadd</
Suggest anything to improve on that?
Do 'token' or 'symbol' seem plausible?
Closer than function.
symbol? No semantic inference of action as per instruction?
made me think of the linker symbol table?
token?
The <token>mov</token> instruction?
Meh? I think is the appropriate response I've heard :-)
<instr>move</ is simple and clear.... and one more, is
that the problem?
Then (to fill the picture) what of the operands?
add r1,r1,[r2,lsl #4]!
Pandora's box?
regards
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
